Toronto Photography Meetup Group

TPMG.CA
It is currently Thu Oct 23, 2025 8:04 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Manfrotto Ball Head
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 2:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:54 am
Posts: 28
Location: North York
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Hi everyone,

I am trying to purchase a ball head for my tripod, did a little bit research my own, now narrow down between 498CR2 and 496CR2. Anyone can give me some comments about these two heads or even better options? BTW, I mainly use Canon 5D Mark 2 plus 24-70 F2.8.

Many Thanks,

Janet


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 4:28 pm 
Offline
Official TPMG Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 2:22 pm
Posts: 983
Has thanked: 12 times
Have thanks: 6 times
Flickr: www.flickr.com/enian82
I own the 486RC 2....its fantastic ..but i like the pistol grip ...
I never used a pistol grip....From the looks of it... makes me feel that I can use it a lot better than my 486RC2....
good luck


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 5:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:54 am
Posts: 28
Location: North York
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
But Yesh, do you think 486 can support Mark 2 very well? Plus a flash? Will be too heavy for it?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 5:18 pm 
Offline
Official TPMG Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 2:22 pm
Posts: 983
Has thanked: 12 times
Have thanks: 6 times
Flickr: www.flickr.com/enian82
Yea it will


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 6:30 pm 
Offline
TPMG ARISTOCRAT
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:45 pm
Posts: 5371
Location: Etobicoke
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 10 times
Flickr: www.flickr.com/potatoeye/
I use that 498 and it's more than enough for the combination you have, if you go into 300+ lenses then better get a bigger head


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 9:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 9:04 am
Posts: 159
Location: Downtown Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
i'm not a huge expert, but i recently purchased a Vanguard SB-250 and it's absolutely solid. Many reviews out there said it was one of the better ballheads for the price (approx $100).

Very well built.. check it out if you're still open to other options.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 10:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:54 am
Posts: 28
Location: North York
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Dimitri,

How come your still leave Etobicoke there, only adding "currently in Vancouver", does that mean you will come back to TO right after your study?

The 498 is about 0.5lb heavier than 496. If you and Yesh both think 496 is not enough for my body+lens+flash, I feel like have no other options other han 498 although I don't think I will use flash that often on my tripod, just need to be in case. Prepare for the heaviest setting for your head and tripod, right?

Janet


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 1:02 pm 
Offline
TPMG Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 3:52 am
Posts: 4022
Location: Newmarket
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 2 times
Flickr: http://goo.gl/RJbMu
For a 5D II level camera (pro grade camera), I say steer clear of the Manfrotto RC2's. Nothing but problems.

A little more money, but I highly suggest going to an Arca Swiss style of QR plate. You can modify most of the ball heads mentnioned in this thread to accept an arca swiss clamp from various manufacturers, or get a ball head with one included.

You can get an Arca Swiss QR plate that is custom fit to your camera body, so it will not rotate on the tripod screw (an extremely common occurrence with the Manfrotto RC2's).

One example: http://acratech.net/home.php?cat=131
Or for the top of the line: http://reallyrightstuff.com/Items.aspx? ... k2&key=cat

Note, these plates or l-brackets need not be removed ever.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 3:16 pm
Posts: 659
Location: downtown
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
you should give me your rc2 plates


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 4:21 pm 
Offline
TPMG Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 3:52 am
Posts: 4022
Location: Newmarket
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 2 times
Flickr: http://goo.gl/RJbMu
madelica wrote:
you should give me your rc2 plates


We can discuss a trade. :)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:05 pm 
Offline
TPMG ARISTOCRAT
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:45 pm
Posts: 5371
Location: Etobicoke
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 10 times
Flickr: www.flickr.com/potatoeye/
jshan2001 wrote:
Dimitri,

The 498 is about 0.5lb heavier than 496. If you and Yesh both think 496 is not enough for my body+lens+flash, I feel like have no other options other han 498 although I don't think I will use flash that often on my tripod, just need to be in case. Prepare for the heaviest setting for your head and tripod, right?

Janet


Not true, I can only say the 496 doesn't have separate panning control. Limiting. 498/488 is better


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 12:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 11:20 pm
Posts: 133
Has thanked: 1 time
Have thanks: 0 time
I am using a 496RC2 and i find it perfect for my use. I have used it with a 5d and a 70-200 f4 and flash and found it to be stable. If you are too demanding of your equipment, you will be spending a lot more money everytime you buy.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 4:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:54 am
Posts: 28
Location: North York
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
PotatoEYE wrote:
jshan2001 wrote:
Dimitri,

The 498 is about 0.5lb heavier than 496. If you and Yesh both think 496 is not enough for my body+lens+flash, I feel like have no other options other han 498 although I don't think I will use flash that often on my tripod, just need to be in case. Prepare for the heaviest setting for your head and tripod, right?

Janet


Not true, I can only say the 496 doesn't have separate panning control. Limiting. 498/488 is better


So what does that extra knob do? I thought one for the ball and socket, the other one for the panoramic rotation axis. Is that enough?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 4:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:38 pm
Posts: 507
Location: Ajax
Has thanked: 1 time
Have thanks: 8 times
Have you given any thought to the Vanguard ball head. Ive been really happy with mine.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 9:03 pm 
Offline
TPMG ARISTOCRAT
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:45 pm
Posts: 5371
Location: Etobicoke
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 10 times
Flickr: www.flickr.com/potatoeye/
jshan2001 wrote:
PotatoEYE wrote:
jshan2001 wrote:
Dimitri,

The 498 is about 0.5lb heavier than 496. If you and Yesh both think 496 is not enough for my body+lens+flash, I feel like have no other options other han 498 although I don't think I will use flash that often on my tripod, just need to be in case. Prepare for the heaviest setting for your head and tripod, right?

Janet


Not true, I can only say the 496 doesn't have separate panning control. Limiting. 498/488 is better


So what does that extra knob do? I thought one for the ball and socket, the other one for the panoramic rotation axis. Is that enough?


that's it. 486 only has one


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 9:31 pm 
Offline
TPMG SUPERSTAR
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:29 am
Posts: 3415
Location: James in RH
Has thanked: 2 times
Have thanks: 2 times
Flickr: http://goo.gl/cahhK
jshan2001 wrote:
PotatoEYE wrote:
jshan2001 wrote:
Dimitri,

The 498 is about 0.5lb heavier than 496. If you and Yesh both think 496 is not enough for my body+lens+flash, I feel like have no other options other han 498 although I don't think I will use flash that often on my tripod, just need to be in case. Prepare for the heaviest setting for your head and tripod, right?

Janet


Not true, I can only say the 496 doesn't have separate panning control. Limiting. 498/488 is better


So what does that extra knob do? I thought one for the ball and socket, the other one for the panoramic rotation axis. Is that enough?


The second knob is for tension I believe, not panning.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 9:53 pm 
Offline
TPMG SUPERSTAR
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:29 am
Posts: 3415
Location: James in RH
Has thanked: 2 times
Have thanks: 2 times
Flickr: http://goo.gl/cahhK
The Vanguard GH100 looks promising.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2011 12:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:38 pm
Posts: 507
Location: Ajax
Has thanked: 1 time
Have thanks: 8 times
I looked at the GH100 but settled on the BH100. I felt the pistol grip was too bulky for what I intended. Here is a review of the GH100.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxFHMCFgSE8


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2011 3:04 am 
Offline
TPMG ARISTOCRAT
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:45 pm
Posts: 5371
Location: Etobicoke
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 10 times
Flickr: www.flickr.com/potatoeye/
Seren Dipity wrote:
jshan2001 wrote:
PotatoEYE wrote:
jshan2001 wrote:
Dimitri,

The 498 is about 0.5lb heavier than 496. If you and Yesh both think 496 is not enough for my body+lens+flash, I feel like have no other options other han 498 although I don't think I will use flash that often on my tripod, just need to be in case. Prepare for the heaviest setting for your head and tripod, right?

Janet


Not true, I can only say the 496 doesn't have separate panning control. Limiting. 498/488 is better


So what does that extra knob do? I thought one for the ball and socket, the other one for the panoramic rotation axis. Is that enough?


The second knob is for tension I believe, not panning.


Nope, it's panning control. 498 has 3 controls as opposed to 488: ball release, pan and tension control


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2011 3:09 am 
Offline
TPMG SUPERSTAR
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:29 am
Posts: 3415
Location: James in RH
Has thanked: 2 times
Have thanks: 2 times
Flickr: http://goo.gl/cahhK
Aren't we talking about the 496? .. I think we need pictures :)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2011 4:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:54 am
Posts: 28
Location: North York
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
PotatoEYE wrote:
Seren Dipity wrote:
jshan2001 wrote:
PotatoEYE wrote:
jshan2001 wrote:
Dimitri,

The 498 is about 0.5lb heavier than 496. If you and Yesh both think 496 is not enough for my body+lens+flash, I feel like have no other options other han 498 although I don't think I will use flash that often on my tripod, just need to be in case. Prepare for the heaviest setting for your head and tripod, right?

Janet


Not true, I can only say the 496 doesn't have separate panning control. Limiting. 498/488 is better


So what does that extra knob do? I thought one for the ball and socket, the other one for the panoramic rotation axis. Is that enough?


The second knob is for tension I believe, not panning.


Nope, it's panning control. 498 has 3 controls as opposed to 488: ball release, pan and tension control


Is the tension control really important for a tripod? The price difference is 30 bucks, plus 498/488 is about 0.5lb heavier, taller too. Before digging into this ball head topic, I thought two controls is more general setting. Now I am confused... :shock:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2011 5:15 pm 
Offline
TPMG ARISTOCRAT
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:45 pm
Posts: 5371
Location: Etobicoke
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 10 times
Flickr: www.flickr.com/potatoeye/
Come on, guys, read carefuly:
http://www.manfrotto.com/product/8374.3 ... ect_System

Do you see 2 controls?

only 488 and 498 have separate pan control. 498 is lighter and smaller than 488. 488 doesn't have a tension control as far as I remember. You don't need tension control at all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2011 5:27 pm 
Offline
TPMG SUPERSTAR
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:29 am
Posts: 3415
Location: James in RH
Has thanked: 2 times
Have thanks: 2 times
Flickr: http://goo.gl/cahhK
I totally don't know which ballhead we are talking about now so I give up. :evil:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2011 7:58 pm 
Offline
TPMG ARISTOCRAT
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:45 pm
Posts: 5371
Location: Etobicoke
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 10 times
Flickr: www.flickr.com/potatoeye/
:lol: We had mentioned Manfrotto 486RC2, 488RC2, 498RC2
There is also a 496RC2, I believe. Best choice among those right now is 488RC2 or its newer brother 498RC2


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 11:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:54 am
Posts: 28
Location: North York
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
PotatoEYE wrote:
Come on, guys, read carefuly:
http://www.manfrotto.com/product/8374.3 ... ect_System

Do you see 2 controls?

only 488 and 498 have separate pan control. 498 is lighter and smaller than 488. 488 doesn't have a tension control as far as I remember. You don't need tension control at all.


http://www.amazon.com/Manfrotto-496RC2- ... 729&sr=8-1

Seems like now 496 has a separate pan control. Then which one will you choose?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 11:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:54 am
Posts: 28
Location: North York
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Sorry, my bad...that extra knob is for tension control, still not the panning one.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 09, 2006 10:08 pm
Posts: 606
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
I would recommend that you buy a Arca Swiss plate compatable head. Their clamp system if far superior to the proprietary plates. Great ball heads made by Really Right Stuff and Kirk Photo that you can find at their websites and cheaper ones by Induro / Benro that you can find on ebay.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 5:06 pm 
Offline
TPMG ARISTOCRAT
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:45 pm
Posts: 5371
Location: Etobicoke
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 10 times
Flickr: www.flickr.com/potatoeye/
Sandeep wrote:
I would recommend that you buy a Arca Swiss plate compatable head. Their clamp system if far superior to the proprietary plates. Great ball heads made by Really Right Stuff and Kirk Photo that you can find at their websites and cheaper ones by Induro / Benro that you can find on ebay.


true, except the cost goes up at least 2x


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 12:47 am 
Offline
TPMG SUPERSTAR
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 2119
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 1 time
I used to have a 488RC2. Not too bad a head if your gear is lightweight but once you start mounting a 70-200f2.8 attached to a 5DMKII with grip or 1D body, you'll find yourself having to compensate for creep. I ended up selling that head for an Arca Swiss Z1.

Arca Swiss, Really Right Stuff, Kirk cost 2-3x as much but so worth it. Even the cheaper Benro Arca Swiss compatible heads were pretty solid too. Nice thing about that is that they all take Arca Swiss plates.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 9:45 am 
Offline
TPMG Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 3:52 am
Posts: 4022
Location: Newmarket
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 2 times
Flickr: http://goo.gl/RJbMu
PotatoEYE wrote:
Sandeep wrote:
I would recommend that you buy a Arca Swiss plate compatable head. Their clamp system if far superior to the proprietary plates. Great ball heads made by Really Right Stuff and Kirk Photo that you can find at their websites and cheaper ones by Induro / Benro that you can find on ebay.


true, except the cost goes up at least 2x


3x.

1x to buy the Manfrottol
2x to correct it.

:)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group