Toronto Photography Meetup Group

TPMG.CA
It is currently Thu Oct 23, 2025 10:32 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 3:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 9:44 am
Posts: 547
Location: Here
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Apparently.
According to Nikon Rumours at least.

I wonder about the VR in wides (and super wides) - I never quite understood that but I'm sure there are folks that will appreciate it once it's released.

The 24mm is apparently a lens that was valued a great deal before it disappeared and still goes for quite a bit of money on the used market.

If it's "reasonably" priced (under $2000 or thereabouts) I may consider it.

Cheers,
Dave


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 4:07 pm 
Offline
TPMG Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 3:50 pm
Posts: 8965
Location: Ajax
Has thanked: 3 times
Have thanks: 25 times
Flickr: www.flickr.com/lxdesign
I have the 14-24, and putting VR on a lens that wide is just silly. I don't see the point either.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 4:21 pm 
Offline
TPMG ADDICT

Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 12:52 pm
Posts: 1669
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Dave - i think the discontinued WA that you are thinking of is the scarce and very expensive 28/1.4 AFD. A 24/1.4 would be a different lens altogether and I'm betting it's a DX and not an FX Nikkor (if 24/1.4)

dcsang wrote:
Apparently.
According to Nikon Rumours at least.

I wonder about the VR in wides (and super wides) - I never quite understood that but I'm sure there are folks that will appreciate it once it's released.

The 24mm is apparently a lens that was valued a great deal before it disappeared and still goes for quite a bit of money on the used market.

If it's "reasonably" priced (under $2000 or thereabouts) I may consider it.

Cheers,
Dave


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 4:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 9:44 am
Posts: 547
Location: Here
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
I'd be hoping for an FX and not a DX lens - I can hope can't I? :D

Dave


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 9:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:29 am
Posts: 293
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
i've with dave on this. i'm really hoping for a FX 24m 1.4, that thing on a d700 would just rock. Of course the old 28mm will too but unfortunately thats not in the budget.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:18 pm 
Offline
I'm on TPMG way too much

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 10:53 am
Posts: 1334
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Ken wrote:
Dave - i think the discontinued WA that you are thinking of is the scarce and very expensive 28/1.4 AFD. A 24/1.4 would be a different lens altogether and I'm betting it's a DX and not an FX Nikkor (if 24/1.4)


Ken, the 24/1.4 AF-S that is expected is very definitely expected to be a FX lens, and a fairly exotic one. Nikon's answer to the 24L.

Note Sony is expected to announce something similar as well, a Zeiss 'large aperture wide-angle'. They were showing mockups last year, but without details.

It's looking like primes are coming back with the major brands, but only as exotics.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 7:39 pm 
Offline
TPMG ADDICT
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:52 am
Posts: 1657
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
i guess the 24mm 1.4 will equate to a 36 (close to standard 35mm) in a DX body. I can see that being popular for sure.

VR is popular right now, i guess Nikon thought they better be reactive?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 7:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 1:21 am
Posts: 141
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Better VR than no VR.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 9:44 am
Posts: 547
Location: Here
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
mawz wrote:
Ken, the 24/1.4 AF-S that is expected is very definitely expected to be a FX lens, and a fairly exotic one. Nikon's answer to the 24L.

Note Sony is expected to announce something similar as well, a Zeiss 'large aperture wide-angle'. They were showing mockups last year, but without details.

It's looking like primes are coming back with the major brands, but only as exotics.


I dig exotic stuff.

I think, even if it's, as someone has speculated, $2400 after taxes for that 24 f1.4, I think I may snag it - as long as it performs as I would expect it to.

I loved the 24L when I was shooting Canon - was really good for weddings on the 5D. Just wide enough without being too crazy :)

Cheers,
Dave


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 12:02 am
Posts: 187
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
when i first read 24mm f/1.4, i thought: "wow, sounds like a lens i'd be interested, i'm sure it will be expensive though so i'll start saving up now" ...

... and then i read ...

dcsang wrote:
..... even if it's, as someone has speculated, $2400 after taxes for that 24 f1.4 .....


... and realized i should have started saving up along time ago! :roll:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:39 am 
Offline
I'm on TPMG way too much

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 6:33 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Toronto, ON
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
This guy (and several others) won't be too pleased if a Nikkor 24mm f/1.4 AF-S does materialize at around $2000. ;)

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 0396255358


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 11:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 2:56 pm
Posts: 729
Location: Mississauga
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
lxdesign wrote:
I have the 14-24, and putting VR on a lens that wide is just silly. I don't see the point either.

IS on the Canon 24-105L @ the wide end is useful for hand-held landscapes @ dusk for me (full frame). I don't take my tripod on vacations, so IS comes in handy for sure. IS still gets you a couple of extra stops, wide angle or otherwise. Cheers.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:33 pm 
Offline
I'm on TPMG way too much

Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 9:08 pm
Posts: 1461
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 9 times
Nikon rumors says it is on for tonight. Nikkor AF-S 24 mm f/1.4 and Nikkor AF-S 16-35 mm f/4.0G ED VR to be announced. Nothing else is expected.

DG


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:10 am 
Offline
I'm on TPMG way too much

Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:13 pm
Posts: 1117
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Flickr: http://flickr.com/samobeid
Well it's a done deal, both FX!

http://nikonrumors.com/2010/02/08/af-s- ... icial.aspx


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:15 am 
Offline
I'm on TPMG way too much

Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:13 pm
Posts: 1117
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Flickr: http://flickr.com/samobeid
The 24 is going to cost a pretty penny...

24mm: http://www.nikon.ca/en/Product.aspx?m=14145

16-35: http://www.nikon.ca/en/Product.aspx?m=14357


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:39 am 
Offline
TPMG ADDICT

Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 12:52 pm
Posts: 1669
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
wow - impressive, only downside is that the 24/1.4 is a G lens (no aperture ring).


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 12:02 am
Posts: 187
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
24 f/1.4 - i drool you.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 9:44 am
Posts: 547
Location: Here
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Dang.. no pricing info as of yet - I do expect it to be in the $2000+ range but would be happy with $1500 :D

(well not "happy" but at least it wouldn't be $2000+)

Cheers,
Dave


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:54 am 
Offline
I'm on TPMG way too much
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 3:02 pm
Posts: 1383
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Ken, I agree, I bemoan the incompatibility with the great Nikon film bodies, but that seems to be the direction they're going...

24mm is unfortunately my favourite focal length... maybe I will switch :)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 5:38 pm
Posts: 132
Location: Richmond Hill
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Flickr: http://www.youtube.com/ernieontario
dcsang wrote:
Dang.. no pricing info as of yet - I do expect it to be in the $2000+ range but would be happy with $1500 :D

(well not "happy" but at least it wouldn't be $2000+)

Cheers,
Dave


check nikon.ca again and price is there:

24mm $2349.95
16-35mm $1399.95


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:58 am 
Offline
I'm on TPMG way too much
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 3:02 pm
Posts: 1383
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
dcsang wrote:
Dang.. no pricing info as of yet - I do expect it to be in the $2000+ range but would be happy with $1500 :D

(well not "happy" but at least it wouldn't be $2000+)

Cheers,
Dave


it says $2,349.95 on the website


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 2:56 pm
Posts: 729
Location: Mississauga
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
etam wrote:
24mm $2349.95
16-35mm $1399.95

IMHO, the 16-35VR is over-priced by a mile. The 24/1.4G price is where I expected it to debut. It will come down in price to be somewhat in line with the Canon version.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:07 am 
Offline
I'm on TPMG way too much

Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:13 pm
Posts: 1117
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Flickr: http://flickr.com/samobeid
Real world samples and a write up...

http://www.bobkrist.com/blog/fast-wide-and-handsome/


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:58 am 
Offline
I'm on TPMG way too much

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 6:33 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Toronto, ON
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
A modern, fast, wide prime from Nikon?!? I'm sure I'll wake up any minute now from this dream... :lol:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 9:44 am
Posts: 547
Location: Here
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
It appears I was checking the DPReview press releases which had no pricing info at the time...

Oh well.. $2400 isn't that bad is it? :D

Dave


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:03 am 
Offline
I'm on TPMG way too much

Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:13 pm
Posts: 1117
Location: Toronto
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Flickr: http://flickr.com/samobeid
dcsang wrote:
It appears I was checking the DPReview press releases which had no pricing info at the time...

Oh well.. $2400 isn't that bad is it? :D

Dave


If you compare it to the 28 1.4 then it's a bargain...lol Glad I held out, 3k-5k for it was nuts!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 9:44 am
Posts: 547
Location: Here
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
SamObeid wrote:
If you compare it to the 28 1.4 then it's a bargain...lol Glad I held out, 3k-5k for it was nuts!


Now we wait for the "other" releases throughout this year and, perhaps, into next. 50mm f1.2 AF-S G and 35mm f1.4 AF-S G :D

I can see myself drawing down a whack of $$$ this year on lenses.. c'est la vie :)

Dave


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 5:38 pm
Posts: 132
Location: Richmond Hill
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Flickr: http://www.youtube.com/ernieontario
SamObeid wrote:

If you compare it to the 28 1.4 then it's a bargain...lol Glad I held out, 3k-5k for it was nuts!


yeah, I wonder what's the market price of 28 1.4 now...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:12 pm 
Offline
TPMG SUPERSTAR
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:46 pm
Posts: 3168
Location: North York
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 2 times
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/thericyip
It'll definitely drop in price a bit. I think most people will go for the new lens for sure. The 28/1.4 will always be that niche lens that collectors will have though.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 2:45 pm
Posts: 66
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
I think $2399 is fair as the Canon one is around $2099. Nikon lenses are generally a little pricier, anyways.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group