Toronto Photography Meetup Group

TPMG.CA
It is currently Thu Oct 23, 2025 6:13 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 11:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 11:21 am
Posts: 237
Location: Brampton, ON
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
according to the seller this 2nd gen adapter can control the aperture and can confirm AF. what does that mean? will it beep when i'm in focus? i just want to adapt my FD lenses on my EOS digital camera, so is this 2nd gen worth it or just get the $20 adapter?

sorry for the newbie question. :oops:




http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vie ... K:MEWAX:IT


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 7:21 pm
Posts: 400
Location: Markham
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/14195211@N07/
It will only let you know AF confirm. It will not control aperture.

It's hard to tell if there is a lens in that adapter.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 1:39 pm 
Offline
TPMG SUPERSTAR
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:46 pm
Posts: 3168
Location: North York
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 2 times
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/thericyip
Action Jackson wrote:
It will only let you know AF confirm. It will not control aperture.

It's hard to tell if there is a lens in that adapter.


+1

Also wanted to warn you about the low image quality you get from adapting FD to EOS with adapters that have glass. Without glass, the lens becomes macro only.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 4:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 11:21 am
Posts: 237
Location: Brampton, ON
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
^so i guess it's really not worth adapting FD to EOS then?

it's just a lot cheaper to use FD lens versus the EF counterpart. :cry:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 7:21 pm
Posts: 400
Location: Markham
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/14195211@N07/
I haven`t used any FD adapters. Are the ones w/o glass really that bad on the zooms?

So far I`m only using M42, and would like to find Nikkor adapters.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 4:10 pm 
Offline
TPMG SUPERSTAR
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:46 pm
Posts: 3168
Location: North York
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 2 times
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/thericyip
It definitely is not worth it. What FD lenses do you have? If they're any good, you can use it on a cheap Canon FD film camera.

If you want alternative manual lenses, Nikon Ai-S primes are great. Some of the Olympus lenses are great too. Both easily mountable to EOS with an adapter.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 4:17 pm 
Offline
TPMG SUPERSTAR
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:46 pm
Posts: 3168
Location: North York
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 2 times
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/thericyip
Action Jackson wrote:
I haven`t used any FD adapters. Are the ones w/o glass really that bad on the zooms?

So far I`m only using M42, and would like to find Nikkor adapters.


Basically without glass in the adapter you only get macro. No infinity either. With glass, the IQ drops to a fuzzy mess. I've tried both adapters, both not worth the time or money.

Fotodiox is the adapter company you want to order from.

More info:
http://tpmg.ca/forum/viewtopic.php?t=16793
http://tpmg.ca/forum/viewtopic.php?t=16885
http://tpmg.ca/forum/viewtopic.php?t=13284


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 5:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 3:16 pm
Posts: 659
Location: downtown
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
you could control the aperture with adapters like that, but you gotta do it manually.

if you look at the pic you will see a small metal bar inside the adapter. this holds the aperture control lever on the FD lenses, allowing you to change aperture on it manually by turning the ring on the lens.

but like the others said, IQ is usually the issue with FD to EOS since infinity requires that little glass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 09, 2006 10:08 pm
Posts: 606
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
I would avoid it. Adapters with lens elements (as all FD to EOS adapters that achieve infinity focus have to be) significantly degrade the image. If you want to use FD glass, grab a micro-four-thirds body as their adapters have no lens elements in them.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 3:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 11:21 am
Posts: 237
Location: Brampton, ON
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Sandeep wrote:
If you want to use FD glass, grab a micro-four-thirds body as their adapters have no lens elements in them.


i'm actually shooting with an E-P1 with FD lenses already but i wanted to try to adapt those lenses to my Canon.

i hear you guys, i'll stay away.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group